Sarah Palin is no longer a Vice Presidential candidate, nor even the Republican governor of Alaska. She is now a private citizen on a book tour, but this has not in any way stopped the relentless attacks by the left hung media. The left felt so threatened by Sarahcuda's book that they had to quickly not only write one about her, they had to make the title and cover look like Sarah's book, Going Rogue: An American Life. Why?

If, as the left purports, Sarah Palin is nothing but a silly woman unprepared for the vice presidency or presidency, why the all out attack? Do liberals spend days, months, weeks, now a year attacking the irrelevant?

This little quote from Jon Meacham might shed some light.

According to Gallup, Republicans are more likely to say they would seriously consider voting for Palin for president (65 percent) than to say she is qualified for the job (58 percent). At the moment she is promoting a book. But she is also, inevitably, promoting a distinctive political sensibility.

Did Meacham ask about Obama's credentials? Did he research why over 90% of black voters voted for Obama and if they evaluated his missing credentials before doing so? Was Meacham put out by Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize which almost everyone admitted he hadn't earned? Or could it just be that because 65% of Republicans could easily get very excited about a very different Presidential candidate Meacham and other liberals are very concerned?

Why is Newsweek so intent on dismissing and jeering at Palin? Why do they care whether Palin is or isn't experienced enough to be President? She's not running. In the same respect, even while Barack Hussein Obama was running for the Presidency, these same authors never questioned his experience as a community organizer and Senator for a few years as making him prepared for the presidency. Nor do they question his experience even now while in office and showing himself totally inept for domestic or international policies.

Palin offers Conservatives what many Democrats thought they were getting in Barack Hussein Obama - a real change; a no nonsense person who stands up to corruption and the "go along with the flow" policies on Capitol Hill that have representatives trading their votes for trade-offs and future promises, even though that traded vote is against the very people they were paid to represent. Conservatives are totally sick of politics being played out in Washington. They are awakened to the fact that "Representatives" don't represent and that Congress does what Congress wants regardless of their constituency. Even those Republicans who stick to a conservative ideology simply won't call the other party out. No one is launching law suits or investigations into the legality of the government take over of GM or private health care. No one in government stepped up to support Chrysler's senior creditors when they were bullied and robbed by Barack Obama into taking a less than senior position in the Chrysler bankruptcy. Congress won't even step up and request to see Barack Obama's original birth certificate or college records so the lingering question about his true birth place is answered!

Update Unbelievable! The AP put 11 (yep that's eleven) writers on "fact checking" Sarah Palin's book! Just how many people has the AP dedicated to "fact checking" Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Barack Hussein Obama on their "health care control"?

Now Conservatives 4 Palin Fact Check the fact checkers and find out that they simply aren't very good at their jobs.

You would think that when Barack Hussein Obama and Joe Gaffe Biden took the 2008 election, the threatened liberals would have backed off Sarah Palin. Ah but not so. They have continued to hound her and her family relentlessly, ensuring that Palin spent most of her time in court defending against all the suits suddenly filed against her.

So Palin finally resigns as Governor of Alaska since the left won't lay off her long enough to let her actually govern. But, even that is not enough. Now come the vicious rumors that Todd and Sarah Palin are getting a divorce.

Of course it's a dumb rumor since as time passes, it will prove to be nothing but a lie; but hey, it's just suppose to be a warning to her that they are not going to let up. And of course as this rumor gets disproved, it's pretty easy to start another.

The only thing I can disagree with in this article is that the media not only took sides against Sarah Palin, but they also did indeed take sides for Barack Hussein Obama and certainly did not hold him to the same standards to which they held Sarah Palin, the GOP Vice Presidential candidate.

In the 2008 election, we took sides, straight and simple, particularly with regard to the vice presidential race. I don't know that we played a decisive role in that campaign, and I'm not saying the better side lost. What I am saying is that we simply didn't hold Joe Biden to the same standard as Sarah Palin, and for me, the real loser in this sordid tale is my chosen profession.

Go here to thank Sarah Palin for putting up with all the garbage and actually adding some life and conservative ideals to the GOP. No human being should have to put up with what's been dealt Sarah Palin, supposedly by her own party no less!

The snarking by the McCain campaign at Sarah Palin seems to be merely gaining momentum rather than being a momentary blurb. Remember, these are the people that decided to "play nice" with Obama's relationships with the racist and America hating Reverend Wright.

Apparently there are some within the campaign that simply can't accept they ran a bad campaign. Sarah Palin was the one who put excitement back into a very angry conservative base. Palin was the one who spent more time before more people than John McCain, cheering him on for the last two months of the campaign.

To now snark at her is unbelievably ungrateful and will only eventually drag more people like me away from this party that can't understand its own mistakes.

The Associated Press is now doing the bidding of Barack Obama by calling Sarah Palin a racist! Why? Did she say some horrible words? Did she use racial stereo-types when referring to Barack Obama? No. No. No. Ms. Palin's "guilt" is for mentioning Barack Obama's association with terrorist William Ayers!

You see, according to idiot Douglasss Daniel, "terrorist" refers to dark skin people since 9/11! Of course Daniel didn't consult a dictionary, he merely made it up so he could call Palin a racist for daring to say anything against "the one".

Daniel's short on other facts to - like insinuating that Palin's contention couldn't possibly be true since Obama was a mere lad when William Ayers belong to the Weathermen Underground and bombed various sites in the USA. So apparently it's impossible in Daniel's little mind to have friends that might be oh about 20 years older!

Daniel also mentions the fund raiser at Ayers house for Obama but apparently brushes it aside by saying it was "early" in Obama's career. He also mentions they served on a committee together but mentions not a word about the charitable fund raising Ayers and Obama did; interestingly enough those records are closed to the public who would like to know more about this activity.

Sorry AP, but Obama's associations, black, white or green, ARE important in knowing just who Barack Obama is.

These folks have just way to much time on their hands. Someone needs to get them real jobs.

I look forward to exposure of body marks on Biden, Obama and McCain.

Michelle Malkin has the story. And here. Basically some hackers hacked into Sarah Palin's private email account, publicized her email, the email addresses for her son and husband and Bristol's cell phone number.

On top of publicizing this private information (which is illegal, a federal offense), they published fake photos including the photoshopped photo of supposedly (but not) of Sarah Palin in a bikini holding a gun.

There is no "too low" for these people.

Talk about Ace reporting! The New York Times sends a reporter and photographer off to get that all important interview with Sarah Palin's hairdresser.

As you are well aware, it's very important to fully understand the history of Palin's hairdo before deciding if she's fit to hold the VP position in the Whitehouse.

The only reason we haven't heard from Biden's hairdresser yet is because.......

1. Biden cuts his own hair (while riding the train everyday) to save money.
2. Biden's hair is a toupee and therefore he doesn't need a hairdresser.
3. Biden still has his mom cut his hair since he's not big on change.
4. Biden's hairdresser has been on an extended vacation.
5. Joe has managed to hide the details about his hairdresser, but the NYT is fast on the trail and will report back to us very soon.

When Charlie Gibson interviewed Sarah Palin he asked about something she supposedly said in her church about soldiers going off to do God's mission. Palin indicated that she didn't believe it was a correct quote and Gibson quickly assured her, it was. That, was a lie.

Palin went on to answer what she was saying - that she was, like Abraham Lincoln, that the soldiers were doing God's will and that she would never presume God's will.

Newsbuster's provides the proof that Gibson's quote, which is now repeated by numerous MSM outlets, was indeed incorrect and mangled to leave the impression that Palin was a religious fanatic. Indeed, Palin's explanation of what she said is absolutely correct.

There's more from the Gibson interview - the editing process that caused all her well-educated answers on foreign policy to be left on the cutting room floor.

Finally we leave you with a wrap up from Pajamas Media:

We saw the oozing condescension of normally mild-mannered Charlie Gibson in his Palin interview. Assuring Palin he was using a direct quote (he was not) to accuse her of believing her son was on "task form God" and laying a gotcha trap on the Bush Doctrine (which has no single meaning), Gibson seemed himself to have a "task" - to trip up a figure held in contempt by most of his colleagues. And of course we are treated to lengthy "investigative" pieces on Palin - which lack any factual support for their scandal-suggestive headlines. But still there is nary an investigative piece in any major newspaper on Barack Obama's ties to the Chicago machine of Bill Daley, the mismanaged Annenberg Challenge, his relationship with Bill Ayers or the problematic donations from the Woods Fund.

And, I might add, the things not investigated by Barack Obama are factual, real events \ relationships that occurred for which no one has to go looking under slimy rocks to report about.

BTW, reading about The Woods Fund may give you some ideas as to how Barack Obama might handle yours and my "contributions" to the IRS if he ever were elected President.